Skip to content

Indictments Highlight Benefits of Remote Jury Selection

Due in large measure to some recent indictments, there has been a growing discussion about the importance of impartial juries in ensuring justice within the legal system. Key components of impartiality of late include both the geography and the process of jury selection. Traditionally, this process has been subject to geographic limitations, potentially limiting the diversity of the jury pool. However, with the advent of remote technology, the landscape of jury selection can and, to ensure the public’s trust in fair juries, likely should change. Remote jury selection, using reliable video conference technology to expand the jury pool, will ultimately make the jury system fairer.

The principle of an impartial jury has long been considered fundamental to the fairness of trials in the United States. An impartial jury is one that is free from biases, prejudices, or any preconceived notions that could hinder a fair trial. The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to an impartial jury, and courts have developed various procedures to ensure that jurors are selected without bias. However, achieving true impartiality has proven to be a challenging task, especially when it comes to the demographics and perspectives of potential jurors. In many cases, the pool of potential jurors is drawn from a limited geographic area, which can result in homogeneity and may not accurately represent the diversity of the community at large. While voir dire aims to select an impartial jury, it is constrained by the demographics of the local area from which jurors are drawn. This limitation can result in juries that do not reflect the broader diversity of society. This is where the concept of remote jury selection comes into play.

It's Just Arithmetic: More Potential Jurors Expands Pool of Fair Jurors

Remote jury selection is a relatively recent development that leverages technology to expand the geographic boundaries from which potential jurors are drawn. This expansion brings several advantages to the process:

  • Diversity and Representation. By drawing potential jurors from a larger geographic area, remote jury selection increases the chances of assembling a jury that better reflects the demographic, social, and economic diversity of the entire community, rather than just a limited local sample.
  • Reducing Local Bias. In cases with high-profile or emotionally charged issues, selecting jurors from a broader geographic area can help reduce the impact of local bias or community prejudices that might sway the outcome of the trial.
  • Improved Access. Remote technology also enhances access to the jury system for individuals who might otherwise face barriers, such as those with disabilities or those living in remote areas. This inclusion ensures that a broader range of perspectives is represented in the jury pool.
  • Efficiency. Remote jury selection can streamline the process by eliminating the need for potential jurors to physically travel to a courthouse. This not only saves time and resources but also encourages a larger pool of potential jurors to participate.
  • Reduced Burden. Traditional jury selection often requires individuals to take time off work, which can create a financial burden. Remote selection reduces this burden and can make jury service more accessible to a wider range of citizens.
  • Enhanced Transparency. Remote jury selection can enhance transparency by allowing observers and the public to participate remotely, ensuring a fair and open process. This transparency will not prevent but will surely diminish the inevitable bald allegations that jurors exhibited partiality or had otherwise prejudged any defendant(s).

A More Inclusive and Impartial System

Calloquy is committed to increasing access to justice. Remote jury selection has the potential to significantly enhance the fairness and inclusivity of a just judicial system. By expanding the geographic and demographic boundaries from which potential jurors are drawn, it increases the diversity and representation within the jury pool. This, in turn, can help mitigate local biases, improve access to justice, and streamline the jury selection process. While remote jury selection offers numerous advantages, it is not without challenges. Some issues, such as ensuring the security and privacy of remote jurors, verifying identities, and addressing potential technical difficulties, need careful consideration and solutions.

With trust in government systems at an all-time low and truth subject to interpretation, we need to work harder for a more just and equitable legal system. This includes exploring innovative approaches like remote jury selection to achieve that goal. By embracing technology and broadening the scope of potential jurors, we can move closer to a legal system that truly embodies the principles of impartiality and fairness enshrined in our Constitution. And lessen the impact of assaults thereon.